Jerick McKinnon Authentic Jersey  97% of Climate Scientists Really Do Agree



First
By the 18th century, the term "statistics" designated the systematic collection of demographic and economic data by states.
Second
The term "mathematical statistics" designates the mathematical theories of probability and statistical inference, which are used in statistical practice.
Third
Blaise Pascal, an early pioneer on the mathematics of probability.



97% of Climate Scientists Really Do Agree



View: 422581
Average user rating 16633
Length seconds: 6m 55s

Rating

Did you know?

Karl Pearson was a founder of mathematical statistics.


discussions:

About: 97% of Climate Scientists Really Do Agree


There's consensus around the consensus. That should settle that, right? Check out my new show HOT MESS for more!
"we're responsible for a lot of it"


Not a subjective statement at all, lol
Dont misuse the word science. Most of so called sciences referred to are to be found among these: Paleontology, anthropology, archaeology, geology, geophysics, evolutionary biology, theoretical physics(non-experimental), astrophysics, astronomy and cosmology,.. These are not frigging Sciences.
None of them can get to the first step of the Scientific method. They cannot perform experiments! = Not Science!
Each claim regarding tru sciences (Quantum Mechanics (Physics), Genetics, chemistry, Biochemistry, Biology) must be accompanied by EXPERIMENTS (repeated), validating each claim. Human progress and technology has evolved the last 150 years thanks to these guys. Not because of the Pseudosciences mention above and, Yes Plate tectonics (Wagner) has more anomalies than a Swiss cheese. And most important. New inventions always can be credited one mans work and most often he need to fight down the "hordes of consensus". This CO2 hoax has 100% to do with GLOBALIZATION and ZERO with preserving our environment! And most obviously. Science is not driven by consensus, but rather the opposite will drive science forward.
"Climate change is definitely 100% real guys. Now go watch this brand new channel whose existence relies on you believing just that or else I won't get paid". No conflict of interest here. Move along folks.
Boy oh boy, are the trolls on the loose. All I said was people need to learn to disagree politely, disagree rationally, and generally, disagree better. Then I get trolled.....
Yeah, keep pushing the alarmist bull shut.
https://climatechangedispatch.com/97-articles-refuting-the-97-consensus/

https://principia-scientific.org/debunking-the-97-climate-consensus-myth/
Their liberal morons scientists . Climate change is a hoax
Climate change is fraud supportered by socialists or used by the elites to overcome traditional democratic governments . Misinformation on a scale that Left leaning governments  would appreciate as they move to usurp free democratic decision making . N.O.A. along with United Nation Panel on Climate Change needs to be investigated for corruption . Many millions know of the corruption ,but the masses are lied to daily and are still unaware .. CNN are a major contributor of mass misinformation about the climate
I call bullshit
Breaking news: scientists have been payed to act like they all agree with eachother.
Plate tectonics is a bad comparison. If the issue is still controversial, then yes, the papers should be explicit. Regardless, nuclear power is what we do to control carbon and pollution, but for that to be a thing, you have to push past the same climate alarmists who apparently want a solution.
Here for the comments, this type of content brings all the science deniers out of the woodwork!
This idiot is assuming what scientists that dont say something, believe. That is NOT science..that is guessing with an agenda in mind
Well, 97% of our scientists are morons then. Nobody denies the climate is warming. However, the evidence for humans being the main reason for the warming is circumstantial at best would be a understatement. Shows you how little we really know and how big our egos really are. If you take a look at the numbers you’ll find that out planet climate fluctuates regardless of what we burn.
Just because it's majority doesn't mean it's true. Not by a long shot.
This video is pure BS. When you know direct explanations of that 97%, this guy looks either like a complete idiot who does not know anything, or as a con artist... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSrjAXK5pGw
A majority of scientists believed cigarettes weren't harmful, a majority at one time believed that the earth was flat. It should never be the majority that we listen to alone, the outliers are some of the best brains in science as history has shown.


Also, try being a scientist and say you don't believe in man-made global warming, you lose your credibility and job in some cases. Of course, the majority will agree, it's too much of a risk to question the narrative.
3 percent think it's the giant glowing ball in the sky called the sun that can literally light earth up like a candle
More specifically 4000 questionnaires were sent out of which three thousand were returned of which 77 new questionnaires were sent to a cherry-picked handful a scientists who responded 75 out of 77 that CO2 was causing warming which is where the 97% figure came from originally. The unmanipulated data showed approximately 60% thought maybe CO2 played a role. Do your research science is hard and true facts are elusive.
This channel continues to be a sad, sad waste of bandwidth.



What is statistics?
Statistics is a mathematical body of science that pertains to the collection, analysis, interpretation or explanation, and presentation of data, or as a branch of mathematics.